Parallelization Workflow

---
provider: openai
model: gpt-4.1
temperature: 0.7
---

<step as="content_generation">
  You are a creative content writer. Generate engaging, informative content based on the user's request.
  Focus on creating valuable, well-structured content that serves the user's needs.

  <user>
    Create content for: {{ content_topic }}
    Target audience: {{ target_audience }}
    Content type: {{ content_type }}
    Tone: {{ desired_tone }}
    Length: {{ target_length }}
  </user>
</step>

<step as="safety_screening" schema={{
  type: "object",
  properties: {
    is_safe: {
      type: "boolean",
      description: "Whether the content is safe and appropriate"
    },
    safety_score: {
      type: "number",
      minimum: 0,
      maximum: 10,
      description: "Safety score from 0 (unsafe) to 10 (completely safe)"
    },
    concerns: {
      type: "array",
      items: { type: "string" },
      description: "List of safety concerns if any"
    },
    recommendation: {
      type: "string",
      enum: ["approve", "revise", "reject"],
      description: "Recommendation for the content"
    }
  },
  required: ["is_safe", "safety_score", "recommendation"]
}}>
  You are a content safety specialist. Review the provided content for:
  - Inappropriate language or content
  - Potential harm or misinformation
  - Compliance with content policies
  - Professional standards

  Be thorough but fair in your assessment.

  <user>
    Review this content for safety and appropriateness:

    {{ content_generation }}

    Provide a detailed safety assessment including:
    1. Overall safety evaluation
    2. Specific concerns (if any)
    3. Recommendation for next steps
  </user>
</step>

<step as="quality_assessment" schema={{
  type: "object",
  properties: {
    quality_score: {
      type: "number",
      minimum: 0,
      maximum: 10,
      description: "Overall quality score"
    },
    strengths: {
      type: "array",
      items: { type: "string" },
      description: "Content strengths"
    },
    improvements: {
      type: "array",
      items: { type: "string" },
      description: "Suggested improvements"
    },
    meets_requirements: {
      type: "boolean",
      description: "Whether content meets the specified requirements"
    }
  },
  required: ["quality_score", "meets_requirements"]
}}>
  You are a content quality specialist. Evaluate the content for:
  - Clarity and readability
  - Relevance to target audience
  - Structure and organization
  - Achievement of stated goals

  Focus on constructive, actionable feedback.

  <user>
    Evaluate the quality of this content:

    {{ content_generation }}

    Original requirements:
    - Topic: {{ content_topic }}
    - Audience: {{ target_audience }}
    - Type: {{ content_type }}
    - Tone: {{ desired_tone }}
    - Length: {{ target_length }}

    Provide detailed quality assessment and suggestions for improvement.
  </user>
</step>

You are a content coordinator. Based on the parallel assessments, provide a final recommendation and any necessary revisions.

<user>
  Content Review Summary:

  Original Content:
  {{ content_generation }}

  Safety Assessment:
  - Safe: {{ safety_screening.is_safe }}
  - Safety Score: {{ safety_screening.safety_score }}/10
  - Concerns: {{ safety_screening.concerns }}
  - Recommendation: {{ safety_screening.recommendation }}

  Quality Assessment:
  - Quality Score: {{ quality_assessment.quality_score }}/10
  - Meets Requirements: {{ quality_assessment.meets_requirements }}
  - Strengths: {{ quality_assessment.strengths }}
  - Improvements: {{ quality_assessment.improvements }}

  Based on these parallel assessments, provide:
  1. Final recommendation (approve/revise/reject)
  2. If revision needed, provide specific guidance
  3. Summary of next steps

  {{ if safety_screening.recommendation == "reject" or safety_screening.safety_score < 7 }}
    Note: Content has safety concerns that must be addressed.
  {{ endif }}

  {{ if quality_assessment.quality_score < 7 or not quality_assessment.meets_requirements }}
    Note: Content quality needs improvement to meet requirements.
  {{ endif }}
</user>

---
provider: openai
model: gpt-4o
temperature: 0.3
---

<step as="security_review_1" schema={{
  type: "object",
  properties: {
    vulnerabilities_found: {
      type: "boolean",
      description: "Whether security vulnerabilities were found"
    },
    severity_level: {
      type: "string",
      enum: ["none", "low", "medium", "high", "critical"],
      description: "Highest severity level found"
    },
    issues: {
      type: "array",
      items: {
        type: "object",
        properties: {
          type: { type: "string" },
          severity: { type: "string" },
          description: { type: "string" },
          line_numbers: { type: "array", items: { type: "number" } }
        }
      },
      description: "List of security issues found"
    },
    confidence: {
      type: "number",
      minimum: 0,
      maximum: 1,
      description: "Confidence in the security assessment"
    }
  },
  required: ["vulnerabilities_found", "severity_level", "confidence"]
}}>
  You are a security expert specializing in input validation and injection attacks. Review the code for:
  - SQL injection vulnerabilities
  - Cross-site scripting (XSS) risks
  - Input validation issues
  - Authentication and authorization flaws

  Be thorough and specific in your analysis.

  <user>
    Review this code for security vulnerabilities:

    {{ code_language }}
    {{ code_content }}

    Focus particularly on input validation, injection attacks, and authentication issues.
    Provide specific line numbers and detailed explanations for any issues found.
  </user>
</step>

<step as="security_review_2" schema={{
  type: "object",
  properties: {
    vulnerabilities_found: {
      type: "boolean",
      description: "Whether security vulnerabilities were found"
    },
    severity_level: {
      type: "string",
      enum: ["none", "low", "medium", "high", "critical"],
      description: "Highest severity level found"
    },
    issues: {
      type: "array",
      items: {
        type: "object",
        properties: {
          type: { type: "string" },
          severity: { type: "string" },
          description: { type: "string" },
          line_numbers: { type: "array", items: { type: "number" } }
        }
      },
      description: "List of security issues found"
    },
    confidence: {
      type: "number",
      minimum: 0,
      maximum: 1,
      description: "Confidence in the security assessment"
    }
  },
  required: ["vulnerabilities_found", "severity_level", "confidence"]
}}>
  You are a security expert specializing in cryptography and data protection. Review the code for:
  - Weak encryption or hashing
  - Insecure data storage
  - Privacy violations
  - Cryptographic vulnerabilities

  Focus on data protection and cryptographic security.

  <user>
    Review this code for security vulnerabilities:

    {{ code_language }}
    {{ code_content }}

    Focus particularly on cryptography, data protection, and privacy concerns.
    Provide specific line numbers and detailed explanations for any issues found.
  </user>
</step>

<step as="security_review_3" schema={{
  type: "object",
  properties: {
    vulnerabilities_found: {
      type: "boolean",
      description: "Whether security vulnerabilities were found"
    },
    severity_level: {
      type: "string",
      enum: ["none", "low", "medium", "high", "critical"],
      description: "Highest severity level found"
    },
    issues: {
      type: "array",
      items: {
        type: "object",
        properties: {
          type: { type: "string" },
          severity: { type: "string" },
          description: { type: "string" },
          line_numbers: { type: "array", items: { type: "number" } }
        }
      },
      description: "List of security issues found"
    },
    confidence: {
      type: "number",
      minimum: 0,
      maximum: 1,
      description: "Confidence in the security assessment"
    }
  },
  required: ["vulnerabilities_found", "severity_level", "confidence"]
}}>
  You are a security expert specializing in application architecture and business logic. Review the code for:
  - Business logic flaws
  - Access control issues
  - Session management problems
  - API security concerns

  Focus on architectural and business logic security.

  <user>
    Review this code for security vulnerabilities:

    {{ code_language }}
    {{ code_content }}

    Focus particularly on business logic, access control, and architectural security concerns.
    Provide specific line numbers and detailed explanations for any issues found.
  </user>
</step>

You are a senior security architect. Consolidate the multiple security reviews into a comprehensive assessment.

<user>
Security Review Consolidation:

Code reviewed:
{{ code_language }}
{{ code_content }}

Review 1 (Input Validation & Injection Focus):
- Vulnerabilities found: {{ security_review_1.vulnerabilities_found }}
- Severity: {{ security_review_1.severity_level }}
- Confidence: {{ security_review_1.confidence }}
- Issues: {{ security_review_1.issues }}

Review 2 (Cryptography & Data Protection Focus):
- Vulnerabilities found: {{ security_review_2.vulnerabilities_found }}
- Severity: {{ security_review_2.severity_level }}
- Confidence: {{ security_review_2.confidence }}
- Issues: {{ security_review_2.issues }}

Review 3 (Architecture & Business Logic Focus):
- Vulnerabilities found: {{ security_review_3.vulnerabilities_found }}
- Severity: {{ security_review_3.severity_level }}
- Confidence: {{ security_review_3.confidence }}
- Issues: {{ security_review_3.issues }}

Based on these three specialized security reviews, provide:

1. **Consolidated Security Assessment**:
   - Overall security rating
   - Highest priority issues
   - Common themes across reviews

2. **Voting Analysis**:
   - Issues identified by multiple reviewers (high confidence)
   - Issues identified by single reviewers (require further investigation)
   - Consensus on severity levels

3. **Recommendations**:
   - Immediate actions required
   - Priority order for addressing issues
   - Additional security measures to consider

4. **Next Steps**:
   - Code changes needed
   - Further testing recommendations
   - Deployment security considerations